Uggen,
Christopher and Irving Piliavin.
1998. “Asymmetrical Causation and the Study of Criminal Desistance.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
88:1399-1422.
Excerpt
reprinted in NIJ Journal 237:20.
1998.
ABSTRACT
We
argue that theory and research on desistance from crime will advance both
policy and scientific goals. Although
etiological studies may yield critical tests of theory, they often suggest
unworkable policy interventions. Neither
the researcher nor the state has the ethical or constitutional license to
alter, say, the personality, parental background, or associates of "at
risk" or "predelinquent" youth who have yet to violate the
law. Desistance researchers, in
contrast, have a more legitimate and expansive license to intervene: they can
provide or deny truly exogenous treatments and concentrate resources on those
likely to benefit from them. Studies of
desistance -- from crime, substance use, welfare receipt, and other phenomena
-- may therefore prove a useful policy guide.
Yet we also need theories of desistance, since manipulating the
conditions which give rise to a phenomenon is unlikely to curb the
phenomenon. To the extent that such
asymmetrical causation applies to crime, etiological theories must be modified
to explain desistance. We discuss early
desistance models, recent advances in developmental and life-course conceptions
of crime, and the debate over criminal careers and the age-crime curve. We then advance a desistance model founded on
choice, commitment, and opportunity.